<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This is not Podanychroma monticola HUDEPOHL 1989</title>
	<atom:link href="http://salagubang.net/blog/2008/05/06/this-is-not-podanychroma-monticola-hudepohl-1989/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://salagubang.net/blog/2008/05/06/this-is-not-podanychroma-monticola-hudepohl-1989/</link>
	<description>Your Online Resource on Philippine Beetles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:47:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Update on supposed P. monticola Salagubang: Your Online Resource on Philippine Coleoptera</title>
		<link>http://salagubang.net/blog/2008/05/06/this-is-not-podanychroma-monticola-hudepohl-1989/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Update on supposed P. monticola Salagubang: Your Online Resource on Philippine Coleoptera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://salagubang.net/?p=56#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] that initially, Vives identified this as Podanychroma monticola HUDEPOHL 1989 and later as a supposed to be new species of a new genus. With their upcoming study, this will then be clarified.    16 July 2008 :: no comments yet  ::  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that initially, Vives identified this as Podanychroma monticola HUDEPOHL 1989 and later as a supposed to be new species of a new genus. With their upcoming study, this will then be clarified.    16 July 2008 :: no comments yet  ::  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
